End-to-end development workflow for Codex

Take an idea to reviewed, verified code.

Forge writes the implementation proposal. Council challenges it. Mind controls the handoff. Hyper applies the authorized change and closes on executed checks.

Independent project · MIT licensed · public source · no third-party model APIs.

01Propose
02Review
03Implement
04Verify

Four workflows · one development path

Start from the idea or call the exact stage you need.

Use Mind for proposal → review → implementation, or invoke Forge, Council, and Hyper directly.

01 Propose

Forge Shape the idea.

Turns goals and constraints into one bounded implementation proposal, or returns nonconverged with the disagreement preserved.

Explore Forge
02 Review

Council Challenge the answer.

Reviews a concrete proposal or diff through isolated roles, anonymous scoring, blockers, dissent, and required verification.

Explore Council
03 Orchestrate

Mind Run the whole path.

Runs Forge and Council, stops on revise or stop, then has Hyper execute and verify the blocker-free, authorized scope.

Explore Mind
04 Implement & verify

Hyper Turn intent into code.

Applies an authorized repository change with adaptive Solo or Relay routing, one writer, executed checks, and a falsification gate.

Explore Hyper
Dissent stays visible.Sharp objections survive the score.
The estimate comes first.See the local heuristic before agents run.
Execution stays explicit.A verdict is not permission to edit.
It stays inside Codex.No outside model APIs to configure.

Role diversity comes from isolated prompts inside Codex—not multiple model providers.

Independent and open source

Built by one maintainer, in public.

I built Codex Council to separate proposal, review, implementation, and verification while keeping one traceable path through Codex. Source, changes, and feedback stay visible on GitHub.

LicenseMIT
ChangesPublic changelog
FeedbackPublic GitHub issues